telegraphic codes and message practice |
integrated H. E. Ives patents 1926-1930
Arthur Korn patents 1902-30
Bartlane patents 1921-35
US Patent No. 1,608,527 (1926)
UK Patent No. 311,810 (1929)
|
UK Patent No. 404,715 (1934)
UK Patent No. 257,013 (1926)
US Patent No. 1,851,072 (1932)
scrambled pictures (image ciphering) UK Patent No. 655,320 (1951)
US Patent No. 1,503,590 (1924)
introduction (separate page)
elemental types (separate page)
|
By integrated systems, I mean systems that offer the whole picture-telegraphic package with minimal human intervention : scanning (also called exploration), coding (and possibly counting), production of an intermediate record (e.g., punched tape), transmission, and reconstitution at the receiving end. The systems described above either required the human eye for analysis or were silent on the analysis itself, focussing instead on the elementary signs for reconstitution. Some of these systems did not involve an intermediate record, but rather synchronous transmission/receiving. Korn and Thorne Baker, for example, preferred these so-called "direct" methods, akin to analog telephony in the kinds of circuits they required. Moreover, there appears to have been a general movement toward direct methods in which alternating or pulsating signals were transmitted over phone lines. One objective was simplication of the facsimile process, so that "comparatively untrained personnel" could use it. Intermediate perforated tape records did not fit into this objective. And so we have McFarlane and Hansen 1939 US 2,164,038, describing a system that was essentially already in use at that time. In some sense, they were leaving something like PCM coding of pictures -- that is, quanitizing samples -- behind, at about the same time Reeves conceptualized Pulse Code Modulation for telephony. Direct methods are mentioned mostly in passing below. I focus rather on "indirect" methods involving analysis of pixel-like zones into classes of grayscale values, transmission of that coded information, and reconstitution into "elementary signs" whether they be printed or photographic dots of different sizes, or some other form. The expression "indirect" might also be characterized as a condition of "off line," in which analysis, coding and preparation of perforated tape intermediate records happened separately from transmission.
|
Herbert E Ives (1882-1953)
picture transmission patents, 1926-1931 1926 US 1,580,896
1926 US 1,606,227
1926 US 1,607,893
1927 US 1,631,963
1928 US 1,683,894
1928 US 1,688,081
1928 US 1,691,071
1929 US 1,717,781
1931 US 1,815,203
sources Buckley, Oliver E. and Karl K. Darrow. 1956. "Herbert Eugene Ives, 1882-1953." National Academy of Sciences, Biographical Memoirs 29 (1956): 144-189 [lists publications, patents; emphasises "scientific" over engineering activities] Ives, H.E., J. W. Horton, R. D. Parker and A. B. Clark. 1925. "The Transmission of Pictures Over Telephone Lines." Bell System Technical Journal 4 (April 1925): 186-214
|
|
US Patent No 1,580,896
|
Picture Analysis |
Herbert E. Ives (assignor to Western Electric Company |
This first of some 15 or so Ives patents for "picture transmission" employs photo-electric cell, plus operator : "An operator by observing the deflections of the indicating instrument may cause the perforation of a tape in accordance with symbols characteristic of the tone value indicated by the indicating instrument. The tape may then be passed through a telegraph transmitter... for causing the operation of a receiving printer which will reproduce the original picture." (1:28ff) |
Uses a galvonometer with a graduated scale, but no automatic feed of signal through relays with different settings -- hence need for a human attendant to operate a board of nine "character keys" -- five for tones, one each for carriage return and line feed, plus two keys for completing circuits (2:42ff).
|
We begin a survey of "automated" systems with this first Ives patent for picture analysis. It is transitional, because an operator must manually key an encoding device -- the tape perforator -- as he or she monitors successive readings from a galvanometer. This vestige of earlier ideas would be gone in Horton Ives and Long 1926/1,606,227, which claimed to be a "working whole suitable for commercial transmission of pictures." In image below right can be seen an observation microscope "used for inspecting the light valve aperture for adjusting purposes." This device was probably a part of the working prototype machine, and provides yet another vestige of human analysis of the image -- here only to calibrate the galvanometer dial or the relays.
|
Fig. 7 -- Sending end apparatus showing motor, film carriage, optical system and amplifier modulator. Ives is at left. |
Fig. 8 -- View of receiving end apparatus showing light valve and observation microscope. ex Ives, Horton, Parker and Clark (1925)
|
Arthur Korn (1870-1945)
phototelegraphy patents, 1902-1927 1902 UK 1325
1903 UK 23,876
1906 UK 16343
1907 UK 1548
1907 UK 8727
1927 US 1,615,015
1927 US 1,618,964
1930 US 1,745,018
|
"For producing a telegram for intance in the Morse alphabet preferably two cathodic tubes with narrow windows placed side by side are employed, so that a single stroke produced by the one tube on the sensitive film, paper or the like corresponds to the point in the Morse alphabet and that two strokes simultaneously produced by both tubes correspond to the dash in the Morse alphabet. At the sending station the transmitter is further adapted to produce and transmit at pleasure positive and negative electrical impulses or disturbances. In lieu of the signs of the Morse alphabet some other combinations of signs may be registered in the same manner." (3:11ff) Where not Morse but "half tone engravings or pictures, manuscripts, sketches and the like" are to be produced, only cathodic tube J1 is used, to expose radiation onto sensitive paper attached to roller K1. When a telegram is to be produced, cathodic tube J1 is disengaged and the two tubes X and Y are engaged. Tube X produces radiation "through its window" for one stroke; tubes X and Y produce radiation to produce two strokes, "which correspond to the dash in the Morse alphabet or to a second sign of another alphabet." (5:16ff) Korn preferred direct over indirect -- coded, intermediate record -- processes; this is an interesting condundrum in which code itself is treated as a picture. This specification focuses on the receiving station; at the sending station, "a suitable pencil is employed which touches the surface of the original and is in any well known manner arranged for opening and closing the sending circuit..." (2:45ff) |
Korn and the "indirect method" Thorne Baker (1927) writes : "A further method of employing a code was adopted recently by Korn, who devised an instrument for rapidly assigning to the unit tones of a photographic image the appropriate code letters, and a second instrument rather on the lines of a typewriter for reconstructing the image from the code telegram. The latter could, of course, be sent equally well by wire or wireless, and an actual example of such a code transmission from the United States to Italy is seen in Fig. 11. The code method has appealed to the imagination of many inventors, but it seems doubtful whether in the long run it can vie with more direct processes." (20) The same image is presented in Korn's own Bildtelegraphie (1927), in chapter 11 devoted to such "indirect methods". Chapter 11 of that book runs as follows (my rough Englishing, with thanks to Dorothee Weinlich in Berlin) : I would like further to briefly mention methods by which pictures may be transmitted by cipher telegrams and punched tape. Individual picture elements are photoelectrically scanned and translated into ciphers. For example, a light picture element is assigned the letter "A", a dark element the letter "Z", and the remaining graduated tones are assigned their respective letters, which are then transmitted telegraphically. One can also use photoelectric cells to generate differerent current strengths for the different brightnesses of each picture element; these in turn can actuate the different letters of a printer for the automatic dispatch of a telegram. The telegram is sent in the usual way, by cable or wireless, and the picture is reconstituted at the receiving end. The same can happen with the use of punched tape; the recomposition of the image is done with a simple typewriter, where the typebars bear not individual letters but small squares or rectangles whose dimensions range from large to small, each representing the tone assigned to its letter. For a "Z", a small rectangle is printed that fills out a grid space. A "Y" will be a somewhat smaller rectangle, and so on down down to the smallest point. The "A" bar will leave an empty space. Thus does one print one picture element after another, following the received telegram, to build up the same picture that was originally scanned and transformed into a cipher telegram. In this way, I effected a wireless transmission of a photograph over the ocean, from Rome via Nauen and Bar Harbor to New York, in 1922. I prepared a similar method also for black and white, obtaining the advantage that a single letter can represent five successive picture elements, and so reduce telegram wordcount down to one fifth. These indirect methods offer obvious advantages over direct methods: (a) scanning and reproduction at the receiver end are done off-line, and do not tie up long-distance circuits or wireless stations, and (b) they require only the usual telegraph working. There are no requirements for synchrony between sending and receiving station, and they take advantage advantage of the broad reach of ordinary telegraph service. One would ordinarily prefer direct picture transmission where possible, because it is more economical and can be done in shorter time. But where direct phototelegraphy is uncertain or impossible, e.g., because of distance, then the indirect method should be used. |
Fig. 28. Telegraphische Übertragung einer Photographie mit Hilfe von Buchstaben telegrammen (Rom - New York 1922).
|
Above is an example of a phototelegram. The orginal has been analyzed in what appear to be five classifications of tone -- hence four diameters of dots plus blank space -- coded, committed to punched-tape intermediate record, and transmitted from Rome to New York in 1922. The analysis would likely have been done by a selenium photocell, feeding varied currents to five tuned relays controlling a tape punching mechanism. The image is shown at three different sizes, to suggest how easily but five grayscales can approximate the tonalities of a halftone image.
|
Bartlane system (1921-35)
Harry Guy Bartholomew, Maynard Leslie Deedes McFarlane Taken together, the Bartlane patents chronicle a gradual move to full automation of "exploration," analysis, encoding, translation to an "intermediate record," and reconstitution at the receiving station. Yet it is not easy to derive the definitive Bartlane system from the various Bartlane patents, so numerous are the patents themselves, their claims, their "examples" of arrangements. The patents suggest a certain tentativeness in the undertaking, constant tinkering with prototypes. The use of five-unit punched tape doesn't necessarily mean 32 variations of tone: it might mean four tones and eight counts; or the rows of holes and the opacity of the (blackened) tape itself might together serve as light-valves and masks, respectively, for physical exposures of five strengths. There was ambivalence about code versus modulation over ordinary phone lines; the intermediate record might actually be a half-tone image functioning as a wax audio record for transmission as sound. And then there are the differences between US and British versions of what are more or less the same ideas: the American versions, typically a year or two behind, might present evolved and/or miss suppressed ideas. All of this is to suggest that the patents start looking like rough drafts and versions of the same work of art, itself always receding. McFarlane writes, about this work, that "...the only way to tell if a change represented progress was to make a picture and judge from inspection of the result... Looking back from the confines of a well-equipped electronics laboratory, it seems astonishing that any progress was made fifty years ago." (1972: 770) The Bartlane System is described by Marius Rensen at www.hffax.de/history. |
"In 1921 a telegraph printer with special type faces reproduced this picture from a coded record."
|
Detail of same. Pattern reminiscent of "crochet" types of the 19th century. Above method was "abandoned in favor of parallel development of an off line photographic reproduction" yielding improved picture quality.
|
Bartlane patents GB 1921 GB 166,917
1923 GB 195,577
1923 GB 197,402
1924 GB 209,816
1924 GB 226,244
1926 GB 262,943
Bartlane patents US 1923 US 1,454,719
1925 US 1,545,301
1927 US 1,653,425
1928 US 1,674,881
1929 US 1,731,518
1930 US 1,758,388
1930 US US 1,754,688
|
Bartlane : perforated tape -- the "intermediate record" 1929 US 1,731,345
|
Harry Guy Bartholomew (London), Maynard Leslie Deedes McFarlane (New York) |
The following patents are grouped together, out of chronology, because each of them directly relate to coding and efficient use of tape -- that is to say, data compression.
|
1929 US 1,731,345
The first -- 1929 US 1,731,345 -- sets the stage. A first intermediate record is normal five-unit punched tape. As explained in the note to Fig. 10, it can describe as many as 32 tone values, but 10 are shown here. This perforated tape is fed through an apparatus shown in section in Fig. 4, which contains condenser lenses and the apertures (5), which can be adjusted to yield the "area relationships" shown in Figs. 6 and 7. It is the combination of these five apertures, with their varying widths, that yield up to 32 gradations of tone. Note that each row of code in the perforated tape contains information for one "small area" at a time. One hundred such "pixels" in a row would, therefore, require 100 rows of 50-unit code. Subsequent Bartlane patents provide for "counting" of adjacent small areas with the same tone value, as a savings in tape running time (and hence, cost). |
Fig. 6 above "As shown in Fig. 6, the shutters 20 are adjusted so that the five separate apertures in the openings 5 formed thereby have the area relationship indicated by the Circles A, B, C, D and E in Fig. 6. As shown by the graph 35, the relationship between the respective areas of the said five perforations A-E inclusive is substantially linear. Hence,if a certain area of the picture to be reproduced is very dark, almost a pure black, and only a single perforation is formed in the record tape, the location of this perforation corresponds to the opening A, so that when the tape of a duplicate thereof is passed through the appratus shown herein [Fig. 4], only a small amount of light passes to the light-sensitive film. Likewise, when the picture has the next gradation or tone value at a given area thereof, so that two perforations are formed in the record tape, these two perforations will control the apertures A and B. Experience has shown that by thus regulating the light which falls upon the light sensitive-film, that a much more accurate reproduction can be formed." (2:108ff) Figs 9 and 10, at right ⇒ "In the embodiment shown in Fig. 10, the two perforations shown in the third transverse line represents the third tone value, the single perforation shown in the fourth row respresents the fourth tone value, and so on, until nine tone values are represented, the tenth tone value, which is absolute black, being indicated by the total absence of all perforations. By suitably choosing the permutations of the five message perforations, a maximum of thirty-two tone values can be recorded, but the recording of ten tone values has been found sufficient for practical purposes." (3:33ff) |
Fig. 7 above "As shown by graph 35' in Fig. 7, the relationship between the apertures A', B', C', D' and E' is expressed by a graph having different inclinations at the ends thereof with respect to a horizontal axis. ¶ It can be seen from Fig. 7 that the location of a perforation or perforations shown in Fig. 7 substantially affects the amount of light shining upon the reproducing film." (4:71ff)
|
1933 US 1,910,556
1933 US 1,910,586
1935 US 2,021,474
|
1929 US 1,731,345
|
Harry Guy Bartholomew (London), Maynard Leslie Deedes McFarlane (New York) |
By ingenious means described in
The analysis of the image 1,758,388 (1930) introduces a "progressive 'lateral' variation of the reader points...from what may be termed the standard position." The Bartlane system creates five prints, each of which is exposed "for varying lengths of time to the action of light... one of these prints, which may be called the first print, and which is exposed for the shortest period of time, only records the brightest tones of the picture to be reproduced, the second print records the tones of the first print and in addition the next brightest tones, etc., until the last print records ubstantially all of the tones of the picture to be transmitted. As stated in [195,577], these prints are formed upon a metal plate by means of a film of hardened gelatin, which acts as an efficient insulator." In order to secure perfect recording or transmission of the tone values of a print, it would be necessary for the pitch of the said helical path to be equal to the width or diameter of the reader point. This, however, is impossible for a number of practical reasons, and in actual practice it has been found necessary to impart a definite pitch to the said helical path so that the reader points do not pass over each and every consecutive small area of each print. This results in a noticeable loss of detail when the reader points simultaneously contact with corresponding small areas of the respective prints, which has been the practice up to the present time. According to this invention, the reader points are placed so as to simultaneously contact with corresponding small areas of the respective prints, these different small areas comprising a consecutive series. For example... 1,758,388 is, apparently, the same as 1925 GB 262,943 -- which however has different (more specific in some aspects, less in others) language but includes no drawings.
[this is a problem that is addressed as well by Ranger in his important 1926 paper]
See a paper by Wise and Coggeshall in Proceedings of the IRE (May 1941), usefully summarized here.
|
UK Patent No 195,577
|
Improvements in and relating to Telautography or Photo-telegraphy |
Harry Guy Bartholomew (London), Maynard Leslie Deedes McFarlane |
A primary objective of this patent is the elimination of human agency in coding and decoding, by means of sounds from intermediate records on wax cylinders. It does not describe in detail the analysis or initial "exploration" of the original image, for encoding. "A further object of the invention is to provide an improved method of securing the desired graduation... This phase of the invention comprises forming a plurality of representations from the original, differing one from the other in that they each correspond to given fraction of the tones or ranges of tone in the original. "Thus one representation may comprise only the deepest tones or full shadows of the original, a second may include only the next lighter tones or both these tones and the full shadows, a third including still lighter tones and so on. "Four or five such representations will usually be found sufficient, and by their aid a plurality of prints may be produced in register on a single surface in order to provide a final result which shall sufficiently for most practical purposes agree with the gradation in the original." (2:104ff) Moreover, "The object of the employment of the intermediate record is to facilitate the correction or errors which may arise..." (5:25ff)
|
|
UK Patent No 257,013
|
Improvements in or relating to the reproduction of pictures, drawings and other representations by the aid of telegraphy |
Creed & Co., Ltd. and Frederick George Creed |
"...For this purpose, a Wheatstone transmitter may be used, which, owing to all the perforations x in the tape being on one side of the row of feed holes B therein, will have one of the peckers, say the negative pecker, ordinarily used in such a transmitter, omitted. In this case a dot signal will be transmitted for every perforation x punched in the upper portion of the tape." (9:95ff) |
"The receiving and printing apparatus used may conveniently be of the kind described in the Specification of our Letters Patent No. 228,842, but the printing wheel used in such apparatus, will require a few printing levers, namely six in the example now being described, each provided with a different sized pin or projection for printing dots, the different sizes of the dots so printed corresponding in area with the different densities in the original picture..." (9:104ff) |
The elementary signs here are six dots, of six diameters. Presumably a seventh signal -- either "a" or "i" on the Wheatstone tape Fig. 6 -- would cause a blank (white) dot space. Their progressively stepped diameters distinguish these dots from half-tone dots, whose diameters can be any size. We come here nearly full circle to the ideas embodied in Montagna, Mortier and Ellero, and as far back as Carl Fasol who achieved wonders with but four or five dot diameters. This patent is substantially the same as 1929/US/1,713,266.
|
US Patent No 1,851,072
|
Apparatus and method for electrical transmission of pictures |
Gilbert S Vernam, Edward F Watson and Donald B Perry, assignors to AT&T |
"The receiving and printing apparatus used may conveniently be of the kind described in the Specification of our Letters Patent No. 228,842, but the printing wheel used in such apparatus, will require a few printing levers, namely six in the example now being described, each provided with a different sized pin or projection for printing dots, the different sizes of the dots so printed corresponding in area with the different densities in the original picture..." (9:104ff) "If a shade recurs more than seven times in succession a punch will be made on the seventh count and the count will be begun again for another series." (2:123ff) |
Several patents relate to counting elements of a similar shade, and coding that count in combination with the respective shades. Gaynor (1922/UK/190,522) describes a cipher code system in which "the last nine consonants (N, P, Q, R, S, T, V, X and Z)" indicate the number of times a value is repeated along a scanning line. Of course, it takes five letters (each one composed of a five unit code) to yield a five-letter cipher, making this a relatively inefficient means. See also Bartlane 1921/166,917 and 1933/1,910,586 (which allows for up to 32 tone values). I show Fig. 2 because it so clearly expresses the relationship of the five unit code (with its 32 possible combinations) and efforts to exploit it to economize on tape length (hence transmission time and expense). Five-unit tape limits the number of elemental signs that can be easily used describe a picture. That limit is not absolute, however; see for example Bartlane 1930/1,758,388 and 1934/GB/404,715. Their 1934 specification explores the tradeoffs in five unit code of, say, six tone combinations (three holes) and maximum four positions (two holes). Electrical Research Products (1934/GB/404,715) provides for 16 values (but does not address "count").
|
|
UK Patent No 655,320
|
Facsimile Telegraph Systems |
Standard Telephones and Cables Limited |
|
"A receiver so arranged as to have its printing unit or mechanism move along the paper on which the message is to be printed in accordance with the same codes as those used at the transmitter will print said message 'in clear,' but any other receiver, the printing mechanism of which be not so arranged as to execute the required movement, will print scattered dots and dashes giving no intelligible character." (1:70ff) |
Scrambles pictures for secure transmission, by (1) employing variations in speeds of scanning (first line, second line and so on) and (2) interlacing (move ahead four, move back eight); requires synchronization between sending and receiving machines. Other example of image scrambling devices include 1922 GB 153,597, 1931 GB 354,249 and the much-later 1951 GB 655,320. Scrambling devices are similar in some ways to (1) condensers, that convert figure series into alphabetical ciphers, and (2) to various encryption devices that emerged out of multiplex printing telegraph technology (Hebern, Sanford Vernam, A G Damm, Ingenieursbureau "Securitas", etc.).
(e.g., 1922 GB 153,597, 1931 GB 354,249 or the later 1951 GB 655,320)
|
|
US Patent No 1,503,590
|
Method and system for transmitting pictures to a distance |
Eliot Keen |
|
At receiving end, vibrations control light beam through lens light-valves onto photographic paper. Perhaps the most important feature of this patent is the synaesthetic idea of translating a picture into sound; other patents on this page translate a picture into code -- a form of ekphrasis. Keen appears to have been an illustrator ca 1900-1920, and has several other patents under his name, including :
|
|